WIP: independence tests for categorical variables#11
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #11 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.99% 84.95% +0.95%
==========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 606 638 +32
==========================================
+ Hits 509 542 +33
+ Misses 97 96 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
Do you think you can make this work without my input? Please merge once you think this is fine. |
|
Sure, no problem |
mschauer
left a comment
mschauer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you feel confident please merge
|
@schnirz Is this "okay enough" for me to just merge? |
|
@mschauer I finally have some time this month to do more work on this, will let you know once I have some sensible ready. |
|
This is great news. There has been also some interest for this package in the last weeks, so this would be a good time. |
|
Yearly reminder ;-) |
| n = length(sch.names) | ||
|
|
||
| return pcalg(n, cmitest, c, p; kwargs...) | ||
| return pcalg(n, cmitest, c, sch, p; kwargs...) |
4 participants
implemented permutation-based independence tests for categorical variables based on mutual information and conditional mutual information
open questions: